工业组织心理学中的社会称许性研究(7)

首先介绍了社会称许性测量中的归因与否认模型、自我欺骗与印象管理模型,相关的研究分别指出社会称许性既具有特质性又具有情境性。其次综述了计算机呈现的问卷测量与纸笔问卷在社会称许性上的差异;称许性反应对组织心理学中构念间关系的影响――称许性对构念间的关系存在调节

第12卷第3期 工业组织心理学中的社会称许性研究 -461-

[16] Dwight S A, Feigelson M E. A quantitative review of the effect of computerized testing on the measurement of social desirability.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2000,60(3): 340~360

[17] Spector P E. Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: myth or significant problem. Journal of

Applied Psychology, 1987, 72: 438~443

[18] Moorman R H, Podskoff P M. A meta-analytic review and empirical test of the potential confounding effects of social desirability

response sets in organizational behavior research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 1992, 65(2): 131~149

[19] Smith D B, Ellingson J E. Substance vs style: a new look at social desirability in motivating contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology,

2002, 87(2): 211~219

[20] Ones D, Viswesvaran C, Reiss A D. Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: the red herring. Journal

of Applied Psychology, 1996,81(6): 660~679

[21] Schmit M J, Ryan A M. The Big Five in personnel selection Factor structure in applicant and nonapplicant populations. Journal of

Applied Psychology, 1993, 78(4): 966~974

[22] Ellingson J E, Sackett P R, Hough L M. Social desirability corrections in personality measurement: issues of applicant comparison

and construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1999, 84(2): 155~166

[23] McCrae R R, Costa P T. Social desirability scales: more substance than style. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 1983, 51:

882~888

[24] Ellingson J E, Smith D B, Sackett P R. Investing the influence of social desirability on personality factor structure. Journal of

Applied Psychology, 2001, 86(1): 122~133

[25] Sackett P R, Wanek J E. New developments in the use of measures of honesty, integrity, conscientiousness, dependability,

trustworthiness, and reliability for personnel selection. Personnel Psychology,1996,49: 787~829

[26] Keillor B, Owens D, Pettijohn C. A cross-cultural/cross-national study of influencing factors and socially desirable response biases.

International Journal of Market Research, 2001, 43(1): 63~84

[27] Myung-Soo Jo. Controlling social desirability bias via method factors of direct and indirect questioning in structural equation models.

Psychology and Marketing, 2000, 17(2): 137~148

[28] 罗凤英．社会的和认知的不准确性对职务分析信息完整性的影响．中国科学院心理研究所硕士论文，2002

Social Desirability in Industrial/Organizational Psychology

Li Feng, Li Yongjuan, Ren Jing, Wang Erping

(Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101)

Abstract: This article firstly discussed the measurement of the Social Desirability (SD) by reviewing the Attribution vs Denial Approach and Self-Deception vs Impression Management Model, and then reviewed the different effects of SD on the Computer-presented and pencil-paper questionnaires tests; the effect of the SD on the relationships of the constructs in Organizational Psychology, and the construct validity of the Personality Measurement used in personnel selection on the basis of the relative papers. At last the directions for the future study of SD on the personality measurement, job analysis and the control method on the SD were presented. Key words: social desirability, self-deception, impression management, personality measurement.